- [WT] [Home] [Manage]
/ssh/ - Social Sciences & Humanities
A board for social sciences and humanities history, philosophy, anthropology, psychology...
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Media ID
File 1
Password (for post and file deletion)
Extra [ Is Spoiler ]
  • Supported file types are: jpg,jpeg,png,gif
  • Maximum file size allowed is 4mb.
  • Blotter updated: 22/10/09
  • 22/10/09 - Trial board for crafts, hobbies and Do It Yourself!
Show/Hide  Show All
File: thank-you_1_ib4f.jpg - (25.16kb, 520x346) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Hello, everyone. Armin Neverwinter 27/9/2009(Sun)03:46:52 No.280590    [Reply]
Hello everyone,
I'd like to formally thank every single one of you for creating such a marvelous imageboard system for discussion of actual topics, rather than the oh-too-common 'need halp with girl' threads on other imageboards.

This is my first post on this board, and I'm honored to be able to (hopefully) contribute!

So, I believe thanks are in order, and I hope to have very interesting discussions with all of you in the near-future!

Yours sincerely,
-Armin Neverwinter

File: axeswithnames_ib4f.gif - (6.19kb, 500x500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Anita Lehtola Herschel 06/7/2009(Mon)01:57:23 No.101520    [Reply]
I found this on /r9k/
http://www.politicalcompass.org/test

I wonder who makes this kind of things
24 post(s) and 16 image reply(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anita Lehtola Brunestud 08/9/2009(Tue)04:10:19 No.245701
>>244545
Soft science is soft!

there is a board for hard science called /sci/ here
>>
Jean Neylon 19/9/2009(Sat)02:08:08 No.265034
>>244545
Technically, anything you can study is "science".
>>
Leah Kauranen 21/9/2009(Mon)04:59:06 No.270371
Heh, Your confusing yourselves. Are you suggesting that there are non-scientific phenomenons. Everything that exists within reality is an can be measured, assessed and predicted scientifically.

Now where I will concede is that where the social sciences are concerned they have an awful habit of fucking over the scientific method and so have given themselves and awfully bad name.

Silly chaps on both sides really I guess....

File: pic-41173_ib4f.jpeg - (59.06kb, 750x469) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Anita Lehtola Brunestud 16/9/2009(Wed)11:14:28 No.261564    [Reply]
According to a new research from Dr Michael Dunn of the University of Wales Institute in Cardiff, women find a man more attractive if he owns an expensive car.
>>
Anita Lehtola Brunestud 16/9/2009(Wed)11:15:09 No.261566
In their study, Dunn and colleagues recruited 120 men and women, aged 18 to 40, and showed them two separate pictures of a model, sitting in two different cars- one a £70,000 silver Bentley continental and the other a battered red Ford Fiesta.

Dunn’s team found that women viewed the same man as ''more attractive'' in the prestige car, while men shown similar pictures of a woman thought she was of equal attractiveness no matter which car she was sitting in.

The study authors say their findings confirm the long held belief that women look to a man’s wealth and status, whereas men are primarily influenced with a woman’s looks.

Dunn said: "There's a variety of evidence that does suggest that females are more influenced by wealth and status. It is very ingrained and the evidence is not just anecdotal. Females focus on questions of wealth and status because if the male possesses those, he'd be in a better condition to rear healthy offspring."

This basic human trait, Dunn believes, would still not change in the future, even as women become increasingly independent and wealthy in their own rights.
>>
Anita Lehtola Brunestud 16/9/2009(Wed)11:15:30 No.261567
He added: “It appears that the stereotype of women being positively influenced by a man’s status is true and, evolutionarily speaking, this makes sense. However, even with the growing number of women in high-paid careers and the fact that they can be highly successful has no effect on how attractive they are to men.

“What you find is that these new, wealthy women still show a preferment for high-status males, which suggests that these preferences are evolutionary, rather than social factors.”

But, the findings, published in the British Journal of Psychology, haven’t surprised Donna Dawson, a psychologist specializing in personality, behavior and relationships, at all.

Dawson said: "It's hard to fight against our genetic inheritance. I think women have always looked to men for some sort of financial security."

Meanwhile, Dunn said they are now planning to carry out further studies, to examine whether buying high-status items like expensive cars can help men deal with their mid-life crisis.
>>
Arazlam Hobbes 17/9/2009(Thu)12:01:00 No.261580
more info:

http://www3.uwic.ac.uk/English/News/Pages/20309mdunn.aspx

File: stellar_ib4f.jpg - (140.17kb, 1024x768) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Orlandeau Hyman 12/9/2009(Sat)11:14:42 No.252902    [Reply]
Is there a non-formal language in which the mass describing inertia and the one describing gravitational interaction are different words?
P.S. Pic slightly related.
2 post(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Shigeru Humphreys 13/9/2009(Sun)06:33:00 No.256444
You mean like weight and mass?
>>
Orlandeau Hyman 13/9/2009(Sun)07:30:03 No.256519
>>256444
Yes, but doesn't weight equal mass multiplies by the acceleration of free fall near Earth's surface?
Somehow, this answers my question perfectly. Thank you.
>>
Shigeru Humphreys 13/9/2009(Sun)08:50:23 No.256679
>>256519
weight doesn't applies just to Earth. The same mass have different weights in different places (Moon, Mars, Jupiter)

File: 6a00d8341c00c753ef010535df5c7e970c-800wi_ib4f.jpg - (67.64kb, 752x459) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Jackie Nagato 22/8/2009(Sat)05:21:37 No.224415    [Reply]
I still can't understand those hormonal humans.

(Three answers most feared by men)


1. (Whatever)

Men: What to have for dinner?
Women: Whatever..
Men: Why not we have steamboat?
Women: Don't want, eat steamboat later got pimples in my face
Men: Alright, why not we have Si Chuan cuisine
Women: Yesterday ate Si Chuan, today eat again?
Men: Hmm..... I suggest we have seafood
Women: Seafood no good, later I got diarrhea
Men: Then what you suggest?
Women : Whatever..




2. (Anything)

Men: So what should we do now?
Women: Anything
Men: How about watching movie? Long time we didn't watch movie
Women: Watching movie no good, waste time only
Men: How about we play bowling, do some exercises?
Women: Exercise in such hot day? You not feel tire meh?
Men: Then find a café and have drink
Women: Drink coffee will affect my sleep
Men: Then what you suggest?
Women: Anything


3. (You decide)
Men: Then we just go home
Women: You decide
Men: Let take bus, I will

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Kurz Gautama 02/9/2009(Wed)05:44:29 No.236510
So what you're saying is generally women add nothing and need men to lead them around.

Not an uncommon observation

File: thanksgoodbuddy_ib4f.jpg - (28.29kb, 383x400) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Otto Gunther Atkins 18/8/2009(Tue)06:35:33 No.216883    [Reply]
las vegas mafia king,JOHN ELLISS 702-873-1299

File: 50219.jpg - (50.7kb, 450x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Anonymous 10/5/2009(Sun)08:03:11 No.17869    [Reply]
Let's chat about modern folklore and mythology.

I see no difference between today belief in skinny pale big headed fetus and the belief in other fantastic creatures in ancient civilizations.

Every culture has its myths and gods ancient people had mermeids, centaurs, medusas... today we have giant mutant mosquitoes and big headed pale skinnies...
7 post(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Sigmund Langley 10/8/2009(Mon)03:11:39 No.205958
Of course, we should not rule out wishful thinking as being at work here. Although, it is a bit easier to understand why someone would wish to have a mystical experience than it is to grasp why anyone would want to be abducted by an alien. But the ease with which we accept that a person might want to have a mystical experience is related to our cultural prejudice in favor of belief in God and the desirability of union with God. The desire to transcend this life, to move to a higher plane, to leave this body, to be selected by a higher being for some special task....each of these can be seen in the desire to be abducted by aliens as easily as in the desire to be one with God or to have an out-of-body experience (OBE).

It is possible, too, that abductees may be describing similar hallucinations due to similar brain states, as Michael Persinger argues. Likewise, the ecstatic and contemplative accounts of mystics may be similar due to similar brain states associated with bodily detachment and a sense of transcendence. Using electrodes to stimulate specific parts of the brain, Persinger has duplicated the feelings of the sensed presence and other experiences associated with near-death-experiences (NDEs), OBEs, mystical experience and the alien abduction experience. The language and symbols of birth, sex, and death may be nothing but analogues for brain states. Shared recollections of experiences do not prove that the experiences were not delusions. The experience which abductees think of as an alien abduction experience may be due to certain brain states. These states may be associated with sleep paralysis or other forms of sleep disturbances, including mild brain seizures. Sleep paralysis occurs in the hypnagogic state or the hypnopompic state. The description abductees give of their experience--being unable to move or speak, feeling some sort of presence, feeling fear and an inability to cry out--is a list of the symptoms of sleep paralysis. Sleep paralysis is thought by some to account for not only many alien abduction delusions, but also other delusions involving paranormal or supernatural experiences.
>>
Sigmund Langley 10/8/2009(Mon)03:13:56 No.205960
There are, of course, certain psychiatric disorders which are characterized by delusions. Many people with these disorders are treated with drugs which affect the production or functioning of neurotransmitters. The treatments are very successful in eliminating the delusions. Persinger has treated at least one person with anti-seizure medication which effectively stopped her from having recurring experiences of the type described by alien abductees and those with sleep paralysis. Countless people with schizophrenia or manic-depression (bi-polar disorder), when properly medicated, cease having delusions about God, Satan, the FBI, the CIA, and aliens.

Even though the stories of alien abduction do not seem plausible, if there were physical evidence even the most hardened skeptic would have to take notice. Unfortunately, the only physical evidence that is offered is insubstantial. For example, so-called "ground scars" allegedly made by UFOs have been offered as proof that the aliens have landed. However, when scientists have examined these sites they have found them to be quite ordinary and the "scars" to be little more than fungus and other natural phenomena.
>>
Sigmund Langley 10/8/2009(Mon)03:17:14 No.205961
Many abductees point to various scars and "scoop marks" on their bodies as proof of abduction and experimentation. These marks are not extraordinary in any way and could be accounted for by quite ordinary injuries and experiences.

The most dramatic type of physical evidence would be the "implants" which many abductees claim the aliens have put up their noses or in various other parts of their anatomy. Budd Hopkins claims he has examined such an implant and has MRIs (magnetic resonance imaging) to prove numerous implant claims. When Nova put out an offer to abductees to have scientists analyze and evaluate any alleged implants, they did not get a single person willing to have their so-called implants tested or verified. So, of all the evidence for abduction, the physical evidence seems to be the weakest.

File: 37778.jpg - (59.8kb, 480x563) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Anonymous 07/5/2009(Thu)07:22:39 No.12250    [Reply]
So what do you guys think about Karl Marx?
29 post(s) and 4 image reply(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Franklin Van Houten 23/7/2009(Thu)04:37:47 No.132554
The concept is not related on how the site authority manages (or in some cases censors) the content, but the fact that this type of site virtually gives common ownership of the information on it. Altough the community still does not have control over the means of production (this function is basically performed by the administrators).
The idea is much better explained in the article and extends to the use of GNU general public and creative commons licenses.
>>
Kurz Herschel 24/7/2009(Fri)09:22:23 No.133754
>>132554
The way I thought of it was how private the content the poster is entitled to create.
>>
Bjorn Neylon 03/8/2009(Mon)09:43:48 No.196189
File: cockmongler_ib4f.png - (188.33kb, 300x396)
i think he was a dumb fatass!

File: 593px-Barin_in_a_vat_en_v2_0_ib4f.png - (119.12kb, 593x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Anonymous 28/7/2009(Tue)04:09:53 No.141209    [Reply]
Related to this thread:
>>120439

In philosophy, the brain in a vat is an element used in a variety of thought experiments intended to draw out certain features of our ideas of knowledge, reality, truth, mind, and meaning. It is drawn from the idea, common to many science fiction stories, that a mad scientist might remove a person's brain from the body, suspend it in a vat of life-sustaining liquid, and connect its neurons by wires to a supercomputer which would provide it with electrical impulses identical to those the brain normally receives. According to such stories, the computer would then be simulating a virtual reality (including appropriate responses to the brain's own output) and the person with the "disembodied" brain would continue to have perfectly normal conscious experiences without these being related to objects or events in the real world.
4 post(s) and 2 image reply(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Melissa Keehl 01/8/2009(Sat)11:40:11 No.192637
I think when I notice that I'm getting no new visual sensory information I would conclude that I'm no longer in my skull (which has eyes) but indeed in a vat....or somebody gouged out my eyes..when I try to reach for my eye sockets, and realize I neither feel my hand move nor the holes where my eyes had once been, I think then I'll assume I haven't a skull. Perhaps I won't know I'm particularly in a vat...but I know I'm not in a skull pretty quickly..
>>
Sigmund Langley 02/8/2009(Sun)03:11:24 No.193344
>>192637
The idea of a brain in a vai is that you will see and fell like any one else. You will see yourself in the mirror, you will feel your own skin, your limbs, the wind in your face and the cold floor in your feet, but they are all just electrical impulses generated by a computer.
>>
Nicholai Fei 12/8/2009(Wed)06:43:47 No.208704
>>193344
Perhaps the same could be said of all senses </Dracula>

File: 108568.gif - (49.51kb, 600x260) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Anonymous 26/5/2009(Tue)08:46:02 No.44993    [Reply]

2 image reply(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 26/5/2009(Tue)08:47:44 No.44997
File: 90296.gif - (67.11kb, 600x260)

>>
Jaroslav Van Houten 25/7/2009(Sat)09:55:48 No.134354
Made me think.
>>
Schiezka McWilliams 28/7/2009(Tue)06:54:26 No.141434
aha, old thread
:)

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
[ File Only] Password
3.14chan Google Search                                       



share.chan3 imageboard banner exchange
pichan 314chan 3.14chan πchan


The Chan Top List

[sci / ssh / geek / sug]