|
>It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.
This was a really thought-provoking passage, that in particular brought several questions to my mind. When I tried to analyze this all, myself taking a sort of centrist view of politics, I compared it to Locke's theory of the Social Contract, naturally. Specifically, are we closer to being justly governed or owned? To what degree is the latter acceptable, either in idealism or by the real laws of sociology? If we are at a level of oppression, economic and with regards to liberty, too high by an idealistic standard (Which one?), is it really intolerable? Should we revolt for the liberty of ourselves and our children, or respect the status quo? Could we do better? What is the best course of action? I guess Jaroslav put it a lot more succinctly than I ended up doing.
|